4Core Venture Labs
Project 2

Regulatory structuring for RWA issuers. Without a lawyer.

Describe your asset and your target markets. The engine generates a complete jurisdiction-specific structuring report, legal entity, token standard, required licenses, documentation checklist, and regulatory risk flags, in minutes, not weeks.

Get my structuring report → How it works

What we do

The bottleneck to every
RWA issuance is legal structuring.

Every founder launching a tokenized asset faces the same first question: how do we structure this to be compliant in our target markets?

Law firms charge hundreds per hour and take weeks. Generic compliance tools are built for post-issuance monitoring, not pre-issuance structuring. There is no affordable, fast alternative.

01
Legal fees are prohibitive at ideation stage A typical structuring engagement costs tens of thousands before you know if the project is viable.
02
No unified global framework exists The same token can be a security in the US, a transferable security in the EU, and a capital markets product in Singapore, each with entirely different requirements.
03
Cross-border structuring has no single playbook A tokenized fund seeking investors across three jurisdictions requires knowledge that no generalist lawyer holds end-to-end.
04
Token standard choice carries compliance risk Choosing the wrong standard for the wrong jurisdiction creates legal exposure that surfaces only at issuance, too late to fix cheaply.
05
Regulations change faster than legal advice MiCA, GENIUS Act, MAS guidelines, the landscape shifts constantly. Static legal memos go stale within months.

The engine

Five inputs.
One complete report.

Enter your asset type, target jurisdictions, investor profile, token standard preference, and current project status. The engine processes everything and returns a structured, actionable report you can share with co-founders, investors, and counsel.

Output 01

Legal Entity Recommendation

SPV, RAIF, Cayman trust, Singapore VCC, the right structure for your asset and markets, with rationale.

Output 02

Token Classification Analysis

Security, e-money token, asset-referenced token, or utility token, per jurisdiction, with the exact regulatory basis.

Output 03

Licenses and Registrations

Which licenses you need, which authority to contact, and approximate timeline, per market, not as a generic list.

Output 04

Documentation Checklist

Offering memorandum, subscription agreement, KIID, AML/KYC policy, what you need and in what order.

Output 05

Smart Contract Requirements

Which transfer restrictions and investor whitelist logic must be encoded, matched to your chosen token standard.

Output 06

Risk Flags and Next Steps

Red zones, mitigation options, and an ordered action list distinguishing what requires a lawyer from what does not.

What changes

The gap
nobody has filled.

The current reality

–Law firms at hundreds per hour, weeks of turnaround

–Generic compliance tools built for post-issuance monitoring

–No self-serve option for early-stage founders

–Static advice that goes stale as regulations evolve

–Enterprise infrastructure inaccessible to small teams

–Structuring that requires you to already know the answer

Project 2

✓Self-serve, AI-generated report in minutes

✓Pre-issuance structuring, not post-issuance monitoring

✓Built for founders at ideation stage, no legal team required

✓Jurisdiction modules updated as regulations change

✓Accessible at a fraction of the cost of legal counsel

✓Tells you what structure to use and exactly why

Early Access

Tell us about
your project.

Four quick questions. We'll generate a preview of the structuring guidance relevant to your situation and add you to our early access list.

Asset

Markets

Status

Access

What type of asset are you tokenizing?

This determines the regulatory classification logic we apply.

Real EstateResidential, commercial, or infrastructure

Tokenized FundPrivate credit, VC, hedge, or PE fund

StablecoinFiat-backed, algo, or yield-bearing

Other RWACarbon credits, private credit, infrastructure

Which jurisdictions do you need to cover?

Select all markets where you plan to issue or sell to investors.

European UnionMiCA + MiFID II

UAEADGM / DIFC framework

SingaporeMAS licensing

United StatesSEC / GENIUS Act

United KingdomFCA regime

SwitzerlandFINMA / DLT Act

Where is your project right now?

This helps us calibrate the depth and urgency of the structuring guidance.

Ideation stageNo legal entity yet, exploring whether the project is viable

Legal entity existsCompany formed, working on structuring the token issuance

Term sheet or raise underwayActively fundraising, need structuring clarity urgently

Platform or advisory firmServing multiple issuers, looking for a scalable structuring tool

Where should we send your structuring preview?

We'll map the key regulatory requirements to your specific situation and notify you when early access opens.

First name

Professional email

✦

You're on the list.

We'll send your structuring preview within 24 hours.

Your key structuring insight

4Core Venture LabsProject 2

The bottleneck to everyRWA issuance is legal structuring.

Five inputs.One complete report.

The gapnobody has filled.

Tell us aboutyour project.